Yet, still, there is an element of truth in Arius' statement: "There was a time when he was not." To speak of a "pre-incarnate Christ," that is from a temporal point of reference, is nonsensical. Ironically, such language infuses a degree of Docetism into the Godhead, not in "seeming to be human" but rather in "seeming to be divine." A pre-incarnate Christ, which is to say a NON-incarnate Christ, is at best an abstraction and at worst a demigod waiting (a temporal verb) for a body.
Thursday, February 07, 2013
Rehabilitating Arius (An excerpt from post.catholic project)
Labels:
Arius,
Christology,
creeds,
Eternity,
Heresy,
Holy Trinity,
Nicaea
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment