It seems [Kimel] will have to speak without contradicting Vatican II's ecclesiology, which might be difficult, given that he seems to want to make a clean, binary distinction in terms of esse sufficient to completely unchurch Episcopalians.
He may also have to ignore the significance of the distinction between (a) Christ being with the Church always, and (b) Christ chastising the church because he loves it. That is, it seems Christ may remain sufficiently present in the church he punishes, which implies deserving punishment--say for material heresy--does not alone entail abandonment.
Anyhow, let's hope he says something new soon; summer is draining away.
Thursday, July 31, 2008
The Anglican Scotist's Comment on the "Kimel Kerfuffle"
I grabbed this from the comments section of my entry that links to Fr. Al Kimel's "Is the Episcopal Church a Truly Catholic Church"(Click Here). As I've come to expect from him, the Anglican Scotist concisely gets right to the heart of the matter:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Indeed! He has a rather exhaustive, unequivocal definition of catholicity to boot.
Post a Comment